Police Misconduct Lawyer · Los Angeles

Los Angeles Police Misconduct Lawyer

Cities and their insurers defend police cases with a familiar script. We spent years on the defense side, and we know how to take that script apart.

Free & confidential

Get your free case review

By submitting this form you consent to being contacted by Oaks Law Firm regarding your case. Your information is kept strictly confidential and protected by attorney-client privilege.

Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"Matthew is very knowledgeable and works with integrity and got us a settlement that can make our lives much, much easier."
S.F. · 2025
Client Testimonial

Auto Accident

"Matt is aggressive with the insurance companies and doesn't back down until he gets you the best result!"
A.M. · 2025
Client Testimonial

Auto Accident

"Not only did Matt get me an unbelievable settlement, he also negotiated my medical bill. He truly is a super lawyer!"
M.B. · 2025
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"Matt is honest, aggressive, and relentless. His staff is attentive and responsive to their clients. I can't say enough about how great everyone at this office is."
S.J. · 2025
Client Testimonial

Car Accident

"They took care of everything after my car accident and really made the whole experience as easy as possible. Super responsive, friendly, and professional – and, honestly, the best outcome."
G.A. · 2024
Client Testimonial

Rear-End Collision

"My car was totaled in a rear end collision on the 101. It took a while, but after 2 years I finally received my settlement and it was far more than I ever could have received doing it on my own. I know they worked diligently on negotiating with my medical providers to come to an agreement that benefited all of us."
L.M. · 2024
Client Testimonial

Rear-End Collision

"After we were rear-ended on the freeway we were falsely accused of reversing into the out-of-state driver on the Wilshire off ramp on the 405 freeway. Thanks to Oaks Law Firm we received physical treatment until our bodies were healed and restored from the accident. Highly recommended if you need honest legal help."
D.L. · 2024
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"I felt like they genuinely cared about my well-being and the outcome of my case. In the end, Oaks Law Firm achieved a favorable result that exceeded my expectations. I will forever be thankful and grateful for their hard work."
J.P. · 2024
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"Matthew is the best lawyer I have ever dealt with. He made sure that things were done in a thorough and professional way. He took care of business like nobody else can. He is my number 1 lawyer. Highly recommended."
P.M. · 2023
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"The best in Los Angeles – hands down."
A.F. · 2023
Client Testimonial

Auto Accident

"Hands down the best firm around."
S.M. · 2023
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"They handle business with integrity and honesty and very professionally. If you want an attorney, give Matt a call."
N.B. · 2023
Client Testimonial

Auto Accident

"All odds seemed to be against us. I wasn't too hopeful for a return for any of my injuries, but Mr. Nezhad fought the liability on our case and settled for full policy limits."
C.Y. · 2022
Client Testimonial

Car Accident

"Matt is a great attorney. I was involved in an accident on the 405 and he took care of me. He got me a great doctor and walked me through all the steps I needed to recover. He got me an amazing settlement and I was pleased with all the results."
H.P. · 2022
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"They really set the bar high for professionalism and excellence."
T.N. · 2022
Client Testimonial

Personal Injury

"We were referred to Mr. Nezhad and he did not disappoint. He worked tirelessly on our behalf. We appreciated his honesty and years of experience and were very pleased with the outcome."
V.C. · 2021

The short answer

Victims of police misconduct in California can recover compensation for excessive force, false arrest, and civil rights violations under federal and state law. Claims against government entities require filing within six months under the Tort Claims Act. Consult a lawyer immediately.

When a police officer violates your rights, the harm goes beyond the injury. A wrongful arrest, a beating during a traffic stop, or a search that should never have happened can cost you your job, your reputation, and your trust in the people sworn to protect you. In Los Angeles, these incidents can involve the LAPD, the Sheriff's Department, CHP, school police, transit police, or any of the dozens of smaller city departments across the county, and each one has its own lawyers and risk managers.

Police misconduct cases are not ordinary injury claims. They are brought under federal civil rights law, California's own civil rights statutes, and state tort law, and each has different rules about who can be sued, what must be proven, and which defenses apply. Government defendants also benefit from strict filing deadlines and immunity doctrines that do not exist in a typical car accident case. Missing a single step early on can end a strong claim before it starts.

Our founding attorney has fought insurers for injured Californians since 2002. We know how claims are valued, how risk pools and city attorneys decide what to fight and what to settle, and which weaknesses they look for first. We use that knowledge to build your case the way the defense will test it, so there are fewer surprises later.

Consultations are free and confidential, and you pay no attorney's fee unless we recover compensation for you. If you or a loved one was mistreated by law enforcement anywhere in Los Angeles County, contact us as soon as possible so we can protect the evidence and the deadlines that matter most.

From the other side of the table

How the defense sees your claim

01

They lead with your record

Defense lawyers routinely dig into a plaintiff's arrest history, prior complaints, and social media to paint you as the problem. We get ahead of that by learning your background first, framing it honestly, and keeping the focus on what the officer did and whether the law allowed it.

02

They rely on the officer's report

The official narrative is usually written before anyone else is interviewed, and it is written to justify the stop or the force. We compare it line by line against body-worn camera footage, dispatch audio, and independent witnesses to find where the story does not hold together.

03

They raise immunity early

Individual officers often argue qualified immunity on federal claims, and public entities invoke statutory immunities on state claims. We plead claims under both federal and California law, including the Bane Act, so that one defense does not dispose of your entire case.

04

They wait out the deadline

Public entities know many people never file the required government claim within six months. We calendar every deadline on day one, file a complete claim, and track the rejection notice so your right to sue is preserved.

Why it happens

Common causes

Excessive force during an arrest or stop

Takedowns, strikes, chokeholds, TASER use, K-9 bites, and baton or projectile injuries can all be excessive when the situation did not justify that level of force. The question is whether a reasonable officer would have used that force given what was known at the time.

False arrest and false imprisonment

Being detained or arrested without probable cause, or held longer than the law allows, can support a civil claim even if the charges were later dropped. Mistaken identity arrests and arrests for lawful conduct, such as recording police in public, fall in this category.

Unlawful searches and seizures

Warrantless home entries, vehicle searches without consent or probable cause, and property seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment may give rise to damages, in addition to any impact on a criminal case.

Retaliation for protected speech

Officers may not arrest, injure, or target you because you criticized them, filmed them, or took part in a lawful protest. Los Angeles has seen repeated litigation over crowd-control tactics at demonstrations.

Malicious prosecution and fabricated evidence

When officers falsify reports, plant evidence, or pressure witnesses to secure charges, the resulting prosecution can support a civil rights claim once the case is resolved in your favor.

Mistreatment in custody

Injuries in holding cells, denial of needed medical care after arrest, and abuse during transport can all be forms of police misconduct, and they often involve multiple agencies and contractors.

What we see

Injuries we handle

Fractures, dislocations, and joint injuries from takedowns
Head injuries and concussions
Dog bite wounds and resulting infections or scarring
Injuries from TASERs, batons, and less-lethal projectiles
Nerve damage from overly tight handcuffs
Post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression
Loss of liberty, employment, and reputation after a wrongful arrest
Emotional distress from humiliation and unlawful searches

What you may recover

Compensation in a California claim

Medical expenses

Emergency care, surgery, therapy, counseling, and the reasonable cost of future treatment related to the misconduct.

Lost income and earning capacity

Wages lost while injured or jailed, jobs lost because of a wrongful arrest, and reduced ability to earn in the future.

Pain, suffering, and emotional distress

Compensation for physical pain, fear, humiliation, and psychological harm, which often represents a major part of a civil rights case.

Punitive damages against individual officers

Where an officer acted with malice or reckless disregard for your rights, punitive damages may be available against that officer. Public entities themselves are generally not subject to punitive damages under California law.

Attorney's fees and statutory remedies

Federal civil rights law and the Bane Act allow a court to award reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff, and the Bane Act provides additional statutory remedies.

The rules that apply

California law you should know

Federal civil rights claims

Anyone acting under color of state law who deprives you of a constitutional right can be held liable in a civil action. This is the primary vehicle for excessive force, false arrest, and unlawful search claims.

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Objective reasonableness

Force is judged by whether it was objectively reasonable in light of the facts confronting the officer, considering the severity of the crime, the immediate threat, and whether the person was resisting or fleeing.

Graham v. Connor (1989) 490 U.S. 386

Tom Bane Civil Rights Act

California law allows a civil action against anyone who interferes with your constitutional or statutory rights by threats, intimidation, or coercion, and it provides for damages and attorney's fees.

Civil Code § 52.1

Government claim deadlines

A claim for personal injury against a California public entity generally must be presented within six months of the incident. After a written rejection, you typically have six months to file suit.

Gov. Code §§ 911.2, 945.6

General information, not legal advice. Deadlines and rules depend on the facts of your case, so talk to an attorney promptly.

Right now

Protect your claim

Evidence to gather

  • Photos of your injuries taken daily as they heal
  • Names and contact details of every witness
  • Any video you or bystanders recorded, backed up in more than one place
  • Booking paperwork, citations, property receipts, and release documents
  • Medical records from the jail, ER, and follow-up providers
  • Torn or bloody clothing, kept in a paper bag
  • Officer names, badge numbers, and patrol car numbers
  • A written timeline made as soon as possible after the incident

Mistakes insurers count on

  • Waiting to talk to a lawyer until after the six-month government claim deadline has passed
  • Giving a statement to internal affairs or investigators without legal advice
  • Posting about the incident or the officers on social media
  • Skipping medical care or failing to report all of your symptoms
  • Assuming you have no case because you were charged with a crime

Step by step

How we handle your case

  1. 1

    Confidential case review

    We listen to what happened, review any paperwork you have, and explain your options, including how any pending criminal case may affect timing.

  2. 2

    Preserve the evidence

    We send preservation demands for body-worn and dash camera video, dispatch recordings, use-of-force reports, and nearby surveillance footage before routine retention periods run out.

  3. 3

    File the government claim

    For state-law claims, we prepare and file a detailed claim with the correct public entity within the six-month deadline and track the agency's response.

  4. 4

    Build the liability case

    We interview witnesses, obtain medical documentation, and pursue records through the California Public Records Act and discovery, including prior complaints where the law allows.

  5. 5

    Litigate or negotiate

    We file in state or federal court as the case requires and prepare it for trial. We pursue a fair settlement when one is offered, and we are ready to try the case when it is not.

From the Case Vault

Related results

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.

Straight answers

Frequently asked questions

For state-law claims against a city, county, or other public entity, you generally must file a government claim within six months of the incident under Government Code § 911.2. Federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 borrow California's two-year personal injury period, but you should not rely on the longer deadline, because losing your state claims can weaken your case. Contact a lawyer as soon as possible.

Civil Rights & Emerging Harms

Related practice areas

Local insight

The Aftermath of Police Brutality

For victims, the emotional damage is only one part of the story. There are medical bills, lost income, public embarrassment, anxiety, PTSD, and the crushing realization that the very institution supposed to protect you may have instead abused its power.

At Oaks Law Firm, we believe police misconduct cases deserve more than generic legal support. They deserve truth, precision, and advocacy grounded in the reality that victims experience every day.

Local insight

What Counts as Police Misconduct?

Police misconduct occurs when a law enforcement officer abuses authority, violates constitutional rights, or acts outside the bounds of lawful policing. While television narratives often frame misconduct as rare or obvious, the reality is far more complicated. Many forms of abuse happen quietly, repeatedly, and behind procedural language designed to shield departments from scrutiny.

A skilled police misconduct lawyer understands that misconduct can include both dramatic acts of violence and subtle patterns of systemic abuse. Common forms of police misconduct include:

Many victims initially doubt whether they even have a case. They assume officers are protected from consequences or fear they will not be believed. In reality, constitutional protections remain enforceable, and victims often have more legal options than they realize. An experienced police brutality lawyer can investigate body camera footage, dispatch logs, surveillance recordings, witness statements, medical documentation, and departmental policies to determine whether a violation occurred.

Excessive force
Unlawful shootings
False arrest
Racial profiling
Illegal search and seizures
Jail abuse and neglect
Sexual misconduct
Cell swapping and unsafe inmate placement

Local insight

The Human Cost of Police Violence

Statistics tell part of the story. Human experience tells the rest.

These stories are not isolated incidents. They reflect a broader issue involving accountability, training, culture, and oversight. Victims of misconduct often describe the same emotional aftermath:

The legal system cannot erase those experiences, but a successful civil rights claim can provide compensation, public accountability, and meaningful acknowledgement that what happened was wrong. A seasoned police misconduct lawyer helps victims reclaim agency after an encounter that may have left them feeling powerless.

A young father is pulled over for a broken taillight and ends up hospitalized after officers use unnecessary force during an arrest.
A college student spends two nights in jail after being mistakenly identified as a suspect.
A mentally ill detainee is placed into a dangerous holding environment without supervision.
A teenager records police activity and is threatened for exercising First Amendment rights.
Fear around law enforcement
Loss of trust in institutions
Anxiety and depression
Public humiliation
Ongoing trauma responses

Local insight

Police Shootings: When Deadly Force Crosses Constitutional Lines

Police shootings are among the most scrutinized forms of law enforcement misconduct, but they are also among the most difficult cases to litigate. Police departments frequently justify shootings by citing officer safety, perceived threats, or rapidly evolving circumstances. Yet constitutional rights do not disappear simply because an officer claims fear.

An unlawful police shooting may occur when:

The US Supreme Court has counseled that each case examining an officer's use-of-force must consider the "totality-of-the-circumstances" surrounding the incident. This means that all of the circumstances leading up to the incident will be considered in a trial.

Deadly force was unnecessary
The suspect posed no immediate threat
Officers escalated the situation recklessly
The individual was unarmed
Warning opportunities on the officer's part were ignored
Mental health crises were mishandled
Officers fired into a crowd
Policies regarding de-escalation were violated

Local insight

Vital Evidence in Police Shootings

There are many different kinds of evidence that can support your case. A thorough investigation may involve:

In many cases, the key issue is not only the moment the force was used, but everything that happened beforehand. Did officers escalate unnecessarily? Were non-lethal alternatives ignored? Was the individual experiencing a mental health crisis that required a different response?

A qualified Los Angeles police brutality lawyer understands how local departments operate, how California civil rights laws interact with federal protections, and how to navigate politically sensitive litigation involving excessive or even deadly force.

Reviewing body camera and dashcam footage
Reconstructing the shooting scene
Interviewing eye witnesses
Examining forensic evidence
Evaluating use-of-force policies
Consulting independent experts
Analyzing inconsistencies in officer statements

Know the hotspots

Cell Swapping and Dangerous Jail Placement

One of the lesser-known but deeply troubling forms of police and correctional misconduct is "cell swapping". Cell swapping occurs when detainees are intentionally or negligently moved between holding areas in ways that expose them to violence, intimidation, retaliation, or unsafe conditions. In some cases, vulnerable inmates are placed with aggressive detainees despite known risks. In others, officers allegedly use cell transfers as informal punishment or coercion.

While less publicly discussed than excessive force, cell swapping can have devastating consequences. Victims may suffer:

Local insight

Excessive Force

Many people hear the phrase "police brutality" and imagine extreme physical assault or excessive force that exists on a broader spectrum. Force may become unlawful when officers use more force than reasonably necessary under the circumstances. That includes situations involving:

Importantly, excessive force does not require catastrophic injury to be unlawful. A person thrown violently to the ground during a nonviolent arrest may still have a claim. An officer who continues striking a restrained individual may violate constitutional protections even if no permanent injuries occur.

An experienced police brutality lawyer evaluates not only injuries, but also proportionality, officer conduct, policy violations, and whether force continued after the threat had ended.

Tasers
Pepper spray
Baton strikes
K-9 attacks
Chokeholds
Violent takedowns
Restraint techniques causing injury
Repeated force after compliance

Local insight

False Arrests and Wrongful Detention

Not every misconduct case involves physical violence. False arrest occurs when officers detain someone without lawful justification. Wrongful detention can happen when individuals are held despite insufficient evidence, mistaken identity, fabricated claims, or constitutional violations. These cases can devastate reputations and livelihoods. Victims may lose jobs, housing opportunities, educational access, or immigration status due to wrongful interactions with law enforcement.

A knowledgeable Los Angeles police misconduct lawyer can examine whether officers:

Even brief unlawful detentions may support civil rights claims under the right circumstances.

Lacked probable cause
Relied on false information
Ignored exculpatory evidence
Violated due process protections
Conducted unlawful searches
Made retaliatory arrests

Local insight

Mental Health and Police Encounters

Some of the most tragic police encounters involve individuals experiencing mental health crises. When officers respond without proper de-escalation training, situations can deteriorate rapidly. Behaviors associated with mental illness, autism, PTSD, or substance abuse can be interpreted as aggression or noncompliance.

A compassionate and experienced police brutality lawyer recognizes the importance of evaluating:

Families affected by these incidents often seek more than financial recovery; many seek policy changes that prevent similar tragedies from recurring.

Crisis intervention failures
De-escalation opportunities
Medical response delays
Use of force against vulnerable individuals
Communication breakdowns
Failure to summon mental health professionals

Local insight

The Unique Reality of Police Misconduct Cases in Los Angeles

Los Angeles occupies a unique place in the national conversation around policing and civil rights. With the third largest law enforcement infrastructure in the country, overtaken by only New York and Chicago, our region has experienced decades of public scrutiny involving use-of-force controversies, racial profiling allegations, and high-profile misconduct claims.

A skilled Los Angeles police misconduct lawyer understands the complexities specific to Southern California litigation, including:

Timing matters tremendously in California police misconduct cases. Certain claims against public entities require rapid administrative filings before lawsuits can proceed. Missing deadlines can jeopardize an otherwise valid claim. That is why victims should speak with a Los Angeles police brutality lawyer as soon as possible after an incident.

LAPD procedures and internal investigations
Sheriff department practices
California civil rights statutes
Municipal liability standards
Public record laws
State tort claim deadlines
§ 1983 claims

Local insight

Why Police Misconduct Cases Are So Challenging

Police misconduct litigation differs from ordinary injury cases in several important ways. First, officers and departments often receive additional procedural protections unavailable in traditional civil disputes. In California, this comes from the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBOR), which establishes procedural rights and protections for sworn peace officers during administrative investigations and disciplinary actions.

Secondly, evidence may be controlled by the very agency accountable for the wrongdoing. Third, public perception can complicate jury selection and case narrative. Victims frequently encounter:

In some cases, departments rely heavily on qualified immunity defenses or argue that officers acted reasonably under tense conditions. A strong police misconduct lawyer prepares for these challenges from day one. Successful litigation requires aggressive evidence preservation, independent investigation, strategic legal analysis, and the ability to dismantle official narratives that may not withstand scrutiny.

Delayed evidence release
Incomplete reports
Contradictory officer statements
Surveillance footage disputes
Institutional resistance
Aggressive defense strategies

Local insight

The Importance of Collecting Evidence

Evidence can disappear quickly after incidents involving law enforcement. Body camera footage may be overwritten, witness memories fade, officers transfer assignments. Victims should preserve as much information as possible, including:

A qualified police brutality lawyer can also send preservation notices to prevent agencies from destroying relevant evidence. The sooner an attorney becomes involved, the greater the likelihood critical evidence can be secured.

Medical records
Photographs of injuries
Names of witnesses
Incident numbers
Video footage
Clothing worn during the incident
Written recollections
Jail paperwork
Communication records

Call (818) 740-7904 now for a free consultation. No fees unless we win. Delaying action can allow injuries to worsen and critical evidence to disappear or be altered.

Local insight

Identifying the Pattern

Individual incidents rarely occur in isolation. A single officer may accumulate complaints over years. Departments may repeatedly ignore warning signs. Superiors may fail to discipline problematic behavior. A strategic police misconduct lawyer looks beyond the immediate incident to determine whether:

Patterns matter because they can demonstrate institutional knowledge and systematic failures.

Prior complaints existed
Similar incidents occurred
Supervisors ignored misconduct
Policies encouraged aggressive tactics
Training deficiencies contributed to abuse

Local insight

Demanding Accountability for You

Critics sometimes portray police misconduct lawsuits as anti-law enforcement efforts. In reality, constitutional accountability strengthens public trust and professional policies. Most communities want effective policing and lawful policing. Those goals are not contradictory.

Civil rights litigation serves multiple purposes:

An experienced police misconduct lawyer understands that these cases carry both personal and societal significance. For many clients, filing a lawsuit becomes the first time they feel heard after being dismissed, ignored, or intimidated.

Compensating victims
Exposing unlawful conduct
Encouraging policy reform
Improving training standards
Deterring future abuse
Promoting institutional accountability

What you can recover

Compensation in Police Misconduct Cases

Victims of police misconduct may be entitled to compensation for:

The value of a case depends on multiple factors, including injury severity, constitutional violations, long term impact, and available evidence. An expert Los Angeles police brutality lawyer can assess both immediate damage and future consequences resulting from misconduct.

Medical expenses

Lost wages

Pain and suffering

Emotional distress

Psychological treatment

Disability

Loss of earning capacity

Wrongful death damages

Local insight

How We Pursue a Police Brutality Case

Not every personal injury attorney is equipped to handle civil rights litigation against enforcement agencies. Police misconduct cases require:

The right police brutality lawyer understands how to challenge institutional narratives while keeping the client's story at the center of the case. Victims deserve representation that combines legal precision with human understanding and empathy.

Knowledge of constitutional law
Experience with Section 1983
Familiarity with governmental immunity defenses
Aggressive discover strategy
Access to expert witnesses
Trial readiness

Local insight

The Wider Impact of Police Misconduct Cases

A police misconduct incident is a deeply personal event that can change your entire life in an instant. Pursuing a police misconduct claim, however, can have effects that reach far beyond the victim and officer in question.

A study into police misconduct found that the behavior can spread among police officers like a contagion if left unchecked. Pursing your claim and holding those responsible accountable sends a message that police misconduct is not a "necessary evil". It is a violation of civil rights that comes with consequences equal to that violation. Each police misconduct case won is a step towards preventing the next from happening at all.

Straight answers

Police Misconduct Frequently Asked Questions

Police misconduct cases can be both complicated and sensitive. In such cases, police are usually defended by unions that favor an aggressive defense. Hiring an experienced law firm is key to winning your case.

Local insight

Oaks Law Firm: Here to Protect Your Rights

At Oaks Law Firm, we approach police misconduct differently. Too many lawyers reduce civil rights violations to generic checklists and recycled legal jargon. But police abuse is deeply personal. Every case begins with a human story: a parent who never came home, a student publicly humiliated, a detainee ignored during a medical emergency, a family searching for answers after a shooting.

When searching for justice after life-changing event, you deserve representation focused on uncovering the truth, protecting constitutional rights, and demanding accountability from institutions entrusted with extraordinary power.

When misconduct is ignored, trust erodes far beyond a single incident. And when accountability is demanded, it sends a powerful message: constitutional rights matter, even when the violator wears a badge. 📞 Call Oaks Law Firm now 📞 (818) 740-7904 to speak directly with a Los Angeles police misconduct lawyer. Free Consultation | No Fees Unless We Win

Written by our attorneys and first published on oakslawfirm.com. General information, not legal advice; figures are as cited in the original article.

The other side already has a plan

Put Oaks Law Firm on your side.

Free consultation. No attorney fee unless we recover. Talk to an attorney who knows exactly how the insurance company plans to value your claim.

Free consultationAvailable 24/7Hablamos españolNo fee unless we recover